Distributed Ballot Based Protocol: Difference between revisions
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*'''Setup phase''': | *'''Setup phase''': | ||
# T prepares an N-qudit ballot state <math>|\Phi\rangle= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}|j\rangle ^{\otimes N}</math>. <p>The states <math> |j\rangle, j = 0,...,D-1,</math> form an orthonormal basis for the D-dimensional Hilbert space, and D > N. The k-th qudit of <math>\Phi</math> is <math>V_k</math>'s blank ballot.</p> | # T prepares an N-qudit ballot state <math>|\Phi\rangle= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}|j\rangle ^{\otimes N}</math>. <p>The states <math> |j\rangle, j = 0,...,D-1,</math> form an orthonormal basis for the D-dimensional Hilbert space, and D > N. The k-th qudit of <math>\Phi</math> is <math>V_k</math>'s blank ballot.</p> | ||
# T sends to <math>V_k</math> the corresponding blank ballot and two option qudits,for the "yes" and "no" option:<p><math> yes:|\psi(\theta_y)\rangle=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}e^{ij\theta_y}|j\rangle</math>, no:<math>|\psi(\theta_n)\rangle=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}e^{ij\theta_n}|j\rangle</math>.</p> For <math> v\in \{y, n\}</math> we have <math>\theta_v = (2\pi l_v/D) + \delta</math>, where <math>l_v \in \{0,...,D- 1\}</math> and <math>\delta \in [0, 2\pi/D)</math>. Values <math>l_y</math> and <math>\delta</math> are chosen uniformly at random from their domain and <math>l_n</math> is chosen such that <math>N(l_y - l_n \text{ }mod\text{ } D)</math> < D. | # T sends to <math>V_k</math> the corresponding blank ballot and two option qudits,for the "yes" and "no" option:<p><math> yes:|\psi(\theta_y)\rangle=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}e^{ij\theta_y}|j\rangle</math></p>,<p> no:<math>|\psi(\theta_n)\rangle=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}e^{ij\theta_n}|j\rangle</math>.</p> For <math> v\in \{y, n\}</math> we have <math>\theta_v = (2\pi l_v/D) + \delta</math>, where <math>l_v \in \{0,...,D- 1\}</math> and <math>\delta \in [0, 2\pi/D)</math>. Values <math>l_y</math> and <math>\delta</math> are chosen uniformly at random from their domain and <math>l_n</math> is chosen such that <math>N(l_y - l_n \text{ }mod\text{ } D)</math> < D. | ||
*'''Casting phase''': | *'''Casting phase''': | ||
#Each <math>V_k</math> appends the corresponding option qudit to the blank ballot and performs a 2-qudit measurement <math> R =\sum^{D-1}_{r=0}rP_r</math> where <math> P_r=\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}|j+r\rangle\langle j+r | \otimes |j\rangle \langle j|.</math><p> According to the result <math>r_k, V_k</math> performs a unitary correction <math>U_{r_k} = I \otimes \sum_{j=0}^{D-1}|j+r_k\rangle \langle j |</math> and sends the 2-qudits ballot and <math>r_k</math> back to T | |||
*'''Tally phase''': | *'''Tally phase''': | ||
#The global state of the system is: <math> \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}\Pi^{N}_{k=1}\alpha_{j,r_k}|j\rangle^{\otimes 2N}</math> where , <math display="block">\alpha_{j,r_k}= | #The global state of the system is: <math> \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{D}}\sum_{j=0}^{D-1}\Pi^{N}_{k=1}\alpha_{j,r_k}|j\rangle^{\otimes 2N}</math> where , <math display="block">\alpha_{j,r_k}= |
Latest revision as of 17:34, 8 March 2021
This example protocol implements the task of Quantum E-voting. In this protocol, the election authority prepares and distributes to each voter a blank ballot, and gathers it back after all voters have cast their vote in order to compute the final outcome.
Assumptions[edit]
- The tallier is assumed to be trusted to correctly prepare specific states.
Outline[edit]
In the beginning, the election authority prepares an N-qudit ballot state where the kth qudit of the state corresponds to ’s blank ballot and sends the corresponding blank ballot to together with two option qudits, one for the “yes” and one for the “no” vote. then each voter decides on “yes” or “no” by appending the corresponding option qudit to the blank ballot and performing a 2-qudit measurement, then based on its result she performs a unitary correction and sends the 2-qudits ballot along with the measurement result back to the election authority. At the end of the election, the election authority applies a unitary operation on one of the qudits in the global state and another unitary operation on one of the qudits to find the number of yes votes.
Notations[edit]
- voter
- c: number of possible candidates
- N: number of voters
- : vote of voter
- T: election authority
- m: number of yes votes
Requirements[edit]
- Quantum channel capable of sending qubits -> (qudit) between the election authority and voters
- Qudit Measurement Device for election authority and voters
Properties[edit]
This protocol is vulnerable to double voting. Specifically, an adversary can mount a “d-transfer attack”, and transfer d votes for one option of the referendum election to the other.
Knowledge Graph[edit]
Protocol Description[edit]
- Setup phase:
- T prepares an N-qudit ballot state .
The states form an orthonormal basis for the D-dimensional Hilbert space, and D > N. The k-th qudit of is 's blank ballot.
- T sends to the corresponding blank ballot and two option qudits,for the "yes" and "no" option:
,
no:.
For we have , where and . Values and are chosen uniformly at random from their domain and is chosen such that < D.
- Casting phase:
- Each appends the corresponding option qudit to the blank ballot and performs a 2-qudit measurement where
According to the result performs a unitary correction and sends the 2-qudits ballot and back to T
- Tally phase:
- The global state of the system is: where ,
For every k, T applies on one of the qudits in the global state.
- By applying the unitary operator on one of the qudits we have where . with the corresponding measurement, T retrieves q and uses values to compute m.